Discussion

Why I recommend left lateral maternal rest when fetal growth is poor

When a fetus shows a meaningful decline in growth, I look for reversible physiology. My recommendation for maternal rest is not strict inpatient confinement; it is a focused, outpatient attempt to improve uteroplacental blood flow while fetal growth and well-being are followed closely.

Pregnant patient resting in the left lateral position
1 Focused intervention: rest in the left lateral position, not continuous inpatient confinement.
107 Patients were studied in the principal SGA cohort before and after two weeks of maternal rest.
64-82% Improvement rates reported across four analyses after two weeks of prescribed left lateral maternal rest.

Why I use rest when growth falls behind

When a fetus that previously appeared to be growing appropriately drops below the 10th percentile, or when the abdominal circumference or growth velocity begins to slow, I treat that change as a warning sign. It may reflect fixed placental disease in some pregnancies, but in others it may represent a reversible decrease in the blood flow and nutrient delivery that support fetal growth.

That is the setting in which I recommend maternal rest. The goal is simple: reduce maternal activity, place the mother in the left lateral recumbent position, and give the uterus and placenta the best physiologic opportunity to deliver oxygen and nutrients to the fetus. This recommendation is made alongside, not instead of, careful ultrasound follow-up, Doppler assessment, antenatal testing, and delivery when indicated.

I do not view left lateral maternal rest as passive care. I view it as a low-technology physiologic intervention for a fetus whose growth pattern suggests that uteroplacental perfusion may be modifiable.

The four papers that support my clinical position

My recommendation is grounded in four related studies that examined fetal growth after a course of maternal rest in the left lateral recumbent position.16-19 They are clinically important because they repeatedly ask the same practical question using different definitions of poor growth: after growth becomes abnormal, does two weeks of left lateral maternal rest associate with measurable improvement?

The answer across the four analyses was consistent. Whether poor growth was defined by EFW below the 10th percentile, Delphi consensus FGR or SGA, deceleration in growth velocity, or combined EFW and abdominal circumference growth velocity below the 10th percentile, fetal growth improved after maternal rest in a substantial proportion of cases.

Step 1

Identify decline

The fetus first shows a change from prior normal growth to poor growth or slowed velocity.

Step 2

Recommend rest

The patient rests in the left lateral recumbent position during waking hours for two weeks.

Step 3

Reassess growth

Ultrasound biometry is repeated to determine whether EFW, abdominal circumference, or velocity improved.

Step 4

Interpret response

Improvement suggests a potentially reversible growth phenotype; lack of response supports continued concern.

Why I believe it may work

The clinical logic

Fetal growth depends on oxygen and nutrient delivery across the placenta. If a fetus has fixed severe placental disease, maternal rest may not change the outcome. But when growth has recently decelerated after earlier normal growth, I consider whether the fetus may still have enough placental reserve to respond to improved maternal-fetal circulation.

MRI evidence for enhanced uteroplacental perfusion

Magnetic resonance imaging studies provide direct physiologic support. Couper and colleagues demonstrated that, compared with the left lateral position, the supine position in late gestation is associated with a 6.2% reduction in oxygen delivery to the fetus and an 11% reduction in fetal umbilical venous blood flow.20 Jani and colleagues later showed that FGR fetuses derive proportionally greater benefit from left lateral positioning because of compromised baseline oxygenation and placental reserve.21

Direct non-invasive hemodynamic measurement

The MRI data are complemented by non-invasive hemodynamic measurements across gestation. In 300 pregnancies, the left lateral position was associated with lower total peripheral vascular resistance, lower brachial and central mean arterial pressure, and higher stroke volume than either supine or sitting positions, while cardiac output did not differ significantly across positions.10

This pattern, reduced afterload with preserved flow, implies improved end-organ perfusion, including uteroplacental perfusion. It offers a coherent mechanistic account for why a simple change in position and activity could produce a measurable change in fetal growth.

Sleep-position epidemiology

Sleep-position studies reinforce the same mechanism. Supine going-to-sleep position in late pregnancy has been associated with late stillbirth risk and reduced birth weight.22-25 Taken together, epidemiology, MRI physiology, and non-invasive hemodynamic assessment converge on the same directional finding: supine positioning can impair uteroplacental perfusion, while left lateral positioning can preserve or enhance it.

Magnitude of improvement

The PORTO multicenter study established that approximately 17% of fetuses diagnosed with FGR spontaneously outgrow their diagnosis without intervention.27 Control groups in the maternal rest studies showed improvement rates of 12-19%, consistent with PORTO.16 In contrast, the rest groups demonstrated improvement rates of 64-82%, representing a four- to five-fold increase over expected spontaneous improvement.

What I mean by maternal rest

The term "bed rest" is often misunderstood. I am not recommending indiscriminate, continuous, inpatient immobilization. That older concept is associated with real maternal harms, including deconditioning, thromboembolism, psychological distress, and financial cost.2

What I mean is specific: outpatient rest, for a defined interval, in the left lateral recumbent position, with continued fetal surveillance. The point is not confinement. The point is to reduce maternal activity and avoid positions that may compromise venous return or uteroplacental blood flow.

How I use this in clinical practice

I use maternal rest selectively. The patient has already had ultrasound evidence that growth is poor or growth velocity has slowed. I then recommend a two-week period of left lateral rest during waking hours, followed by repeat fetal biometry. This creates a practical clinical test: does the fetus demonstrate improved growth when maternal activity is reduced and left lateral positioning is emphasized?

This approach does not delay necessary delivery, and it does not replace Doppler studies or antenatal testing. It adds a potentially reversible physiologic intervention during the interval in which fetal growth is being reassessed.

My position is practical: when the fetus is falling behind, and the intervention is specific, time-limited, and monitored, left lateral maternal rest is reasonable to discuss.

The four papers behind the recommendation

These four papers examine the same clinical maneuver through different definitions of poor growth. Together, they support why I offer left lateral maternal rest when a fetus shows poor growth or declining growth velocity.

Paper Clinical trigger Rest protocol Key finding Why it matters clinically
DeVore et al., Am J Obstet Gynecol 202516 EFW < 10th percentile after a prior EFW > 10th percentile Two weeks of maternal rest in the left lateral recumbent position 75% (199/265) returned to EFW > 10th percentile; non-rest controls improved in 12-19% Supports using rest when a fetus moves from prior normal growth into the SGA range.
DeVore & Polanco, J Clin Ultrasound 202517 Delphi consensus criteria for FGR or SGA Two weeks of left lateral maternal rest during waking hours EFW increased above the 10th percentile in 70% of FGR and 82% of SGA fetuses Shows the association persists even when modern consensus definitions are applied.
DeVore & Polanco, J Clin Ultrasound 202518 Growth velocity deceleration across four definitions Two weeks of left lateral maternal rest during waking hours EFW improved significantly across all definitions: 64-79% depending on the velocity criterion Supports intervention when the problem is not just small size, but a slowed growth trajectory.
DeVore & Polanco, J Clin Ultrasound 202519 EFW < 10th percentile plus AC growth velocity < 10th percentile Two weeks of complete maternal rest lying in the left lateral recumbent position EFW rose above the 10th percentile in 81%; AC growth velocity normalized in 94% Directly supports rest when abdominal growth velocity is poor, the pattern most consistent with impaired nutrient delivery.

EFW = estimated fetal weight; AC = abdominal circumference; HC = head circumference; FL = femur length; FGR = fetal growth restriction; SGA = small for gestational age.

References

  1. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM); Martins JG, Biggio JR, Abuhamad A. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #52: Diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):B2-B17. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.05.010
  2. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM); Lauder J, Sciscione A, Biggio J, Osmundson S. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #50: The role of activity restriction in obstetric management. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(2):B2-B10. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.031
  3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 227: Fetal Growth Restriction. Obstet Gynecol. 2021;137(2):e16-e28. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000004251
  4. Laurin J, Persson PH. The effect of bedrest in hospital on fetal outcome in pregnancies complicated by intra-uterine growth retardation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1987;66(5):407-411. doi:10.3109/00016348709022043
  5. Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Hofmeyr GJ. Bed rest in hospital for suspected impaired fetal growth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000034. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000034
  6. Ueland K, Novy MJ, Peterson EN, Metcalfe J. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. IV. The influence of gestational age on the maternal cardiovascular response to posture and exercise. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969;104(6):856-864. doi:10.1016/0002-9378(69)90637-1
  7. Lees MM, Scott DB, Kerr MG, Taylor SH. The circulatory effects of recumbent postural change in late pregnancy. Clin Sci. 1967;32(3):453-465.
  8. Abitbol MM. Supine position in labor and associated fetal heart rate changes. Obstet Gynecol. 1985;65(4):481-486.
  9. DeVore GR, Polanco B. Assessing maternal cardiac function by obstetricians: technique and reference ranges. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229(2):155.e1-155.e18. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2023.01.003
  10. DeVore GR. Measurements of cardiac function in a prospective cross-sectional study of pregnant women between 10 and 39 weeks of gestation using a computerized brachial blood pressure cuff. Obstet Gynecol Int J. 2025;16(6):190-204. doi:10.15406/ogij.2025.16.00810
  11. Kerr MG, Scott DB, Samuel E. Studies of the inferior vena cava in late pregnancy. Br Med J. 1964;1(5382):532-533. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5382.532
  12. Kinsella SM, Lohmann G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83(5 Pt 1):774-788.
  13. Humphries A, Mirjalili SA, Tarr GP, Thompson JMD, Stone P. The effect of supine positioning on maternal hemodynamics during late pregnancy. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32(23):3923-3930. doi:10.1080/14767058.2018.1478958
  14. Stone PR, Burgess W, McIntyre JPR, et al. Effect of maternal position on fetal behavioural state and heart rate variability in healthy late gestation pregnancy. J Physiol. 2017;595(4):1213-1221. doi:10.1113/JP273201
  15. Vasapollo B, Lo Presti D, Gagliardi G, et al. Restricted physical activity in pregnancy reduces maternal vascular resistance and improves fetal growth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(5):672-676. doi:10.1002/uog.17489
  16. DeVore GR, Polanco B, Lee W, Fowlkes JB, Peek EE, Putra M, Hobbins JC. Maternal rest improves growth in small-for-gestational-age fetuses (<10th percentile). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2025;232(1):118.e1-118.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.024
  17. DeVore GR, Polanco B. Maternal rest improves fetal growth in small-for-gestational age and growth restricted fetuses defined by the Delphi consensus protocol. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025;53(5):1045-1061. doi:10.1002/jcu.23980
  18. DeVore GR, Polanco B. Fetuses with deceleration of growth improve their growth following maternal rest. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025;53(1):103-112. doi:10.1002/jcu.23832
  19. DeVore GR, Polanco B. Improved fetal growth associated with maternal rest in fetuses diagnosed with an estimated fetal weight and an abdominal circumference growth velocity less than the 10th percentile. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025;53(9):1996-2005. doi:10.1002/jcu.70002
  20. Couper S, Clark A, Thompson JMD, et al. The effects of maternal position, in late gestation pregnancy, on placental blood flow and oxygenation: an MRI study. J Physiol. 2021;599(6):1901-1915. doi:10.1113/JP280569
  21. Jani D, Clark A, Couper S, et al. The effect of maternal position on placental blood flow and fetoplacental oxygenation in late gestation fetal growth restriction: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Physiol. 2023;601(23):5391-5411. doi:10.1113/JP284269
  22. Cronin RS, Li M, Thompson JMD, et al. An individual participant data meta-analysis of maternal going-to-sleep position, interactions with fetal vulnerability, and the risk of late stillbirth. EClinicalMedicine. 2019;10:49-57. doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.03.014
  23. Anderson NH, Gordon A, Li M, et al. Association of supine going-to-sleep position in late pregnancy with reduced birth weight: a secondary analysis of an individual participant data meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(10):e1912614. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12614
  24. Heazell AEP, Li M, Budd J, et al. Association between maternal sleep practices and late stillbirth: findings from a stillbirth case-control study. BJOG. 2018;125(2):254-262. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14967
  25. Gordon A, Raynes-Greenow C, Bond D, Morris J, Rawlinson W, Jeffery H. Sleep position, fetal growth restriction, and late-pregnancy stillbirth: the Sydney stillbirth study. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(2):347-355. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000000627
  26. Gordijn SJ, Beune IM, Thilaganathan B, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):333-339. doi:10.1002/uog.15884
  27. Cody F, Unterscheider J, Daly S, et al; Perinatal Ireland Research Consortium. Dynamic growth changes in fetal growth restriction using serial ultrasonographic biometry and umbilical artery doppler: the multicenter PORTO study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;161(1):198-203. doi:10.1002/ijgo.14470